data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/febdb/febdb3597478378e3b87aa8dd30ccd3a3184f864" alt=""
Webvan's abrupt closure wasn't exactly a shock. In its last annual report, the company said there was a strong chance that financial troubles would force the company to shut down.
In the first quarter of the year, Webvan had reported a net loss of $217 million and an accumulated deficit of $830 million. And things only seemed to be getting worse.
"We all knew it was going to happen," said Phil Terry, CEO of Creative Good, a consulting firm that has worked with online grocers. He blamed the company's aggressive expansion into multiple cities, combined with an overly complex website, for causing its demise.
Well, Webvan's demise seemed to have little to do with the quality of its delivery services. Although there are customers who complained of late deliveries or damaged of goods, the grocery services generally received favorable comments from customers.
In fact, Webvan's problems never really had much to do with its customers. It was the lack of customers that was the trouble.
Some people believed that Webvan "may well have 10 or 20 years ahead of its time". And, like many businesses born in the maniacal days of the dot-com boom, it tried to get too big, too fast.
Related Link: http://www.cnet.com/4520-11136_1-6278387-1.html
Technorati Tags:
No comments:
Post a Comment